determine test statisticP valueIf we should reject box plotdoes the evidence support the results?

Part 3 of 7 Points: 9.33 of 16 Save A researcher studies water clarity at the same location in a lake on the same dates during the course of a year and repeats the measurements on the same dates 5 years later. The researcher immerses a weighted disk painted black and white and measures the depth (in inches) at which it is no longer visible. The collected data is given in the table below. Complete parts (a) through (c) below. Observation 2 3 4 5 Date 1/25 3/19 5/30 7/3 9/13 11/7 Initial Depth, X, 51.5 51.5 60.7 43.1 50.7 46.5 Depth Five Years Later, Y, 50.2 51.7 58.1 44.5 45.2 49.7 A. Using the same dates makes the second sample dependent on the first and reduces variability in water clarity attributable to date. O B. Those are the same dates that all biologists use to take water clarity samples. O C. Using the same dates maximizes the difference in water clarity. D. Using the same dates makes it easier to remember to take samples. b) Does the evidence suggest that the clarity of the lake is improving at the a = 0.05 level of significance? Note that the normal probability plot and boxplot of the data indicate that the differences are approximately normally distributed with no outliers. Let dj= X - Y . Identify the null and alternative hypotheses. Ho: Hd = Hy: Hd