Dexcon Technologies, Inc., is evaluating two alternatives to produce its new plastic filament with tribological (i.e., low friction) properties for creating custom bearings for 3-D printers. The estimates associated with each alternative are shown below. Using a MARR of 15% per year, which alternative has the lower present worth? Method First Cost M&O Cost, per Year Salvage Value Life DDM $-200,000 $-40,000 $2,000 2 years The DDM The present worth for the DDM method is $ 462764.2 The present worth for the LS method is $ 556000 LS $-500,000 $-40,000 $21,000 4 years method is selected.

Dexcon Technologies, Inc, is evaluating two aiternatives to produce its new plastic flament with tribological (i.e, low friction) properties for creating custom bearings for 3-D printers. The estimates associated with each aiternative are shown below. Using a MARR of 15% per year, which alternative has the lower present worth? The present worth for the DOM method is $ The present worth for the LS method is $ The method is selected