Discuss three court's decisions of recent lawsuits related:

a) to professional sports.

b) to intercollegiate/Olympic/amateur sports,

c) to stadium/arena/facility management.

1. Explain the parties involved, the court, specifying civil/criminal, state/federal and the name of the specific court, providing the legal issue involved and the court's decision;
2. Analyze the decision's place in the governance of professional athletics for the first article, intercollegiate/Olympic/amateur sports for the second article, and stadium/arena/facility management for the third article;
3. Explain -- and supporting with well-reasoned arguments - widely-held concepts of justice, such as those held through natural law or Judeo-Christian law;
4. (4) Last, put it all together, answering the question: "In today's world, is the decision of court fair?" Do this by (a) connecting your own concept of personal justice to how it impacts your view of the court decision, and (b) connecting and applying your view of civil discourse to the real-world setting of the communities of diverse legal perspectives, all synthesizing them together to provide your own perspective and theory on social justice in this modern, 21st century legal world.