Discuss what you learn regarding the following key points.What are at least two sentences for each key points:

• E-mail is evidence
• E-mail at work is not private
• E-mail is discoverable
• E-mail is a contemporaneous record
• Think before putting it in e-mail
• Employers monitor e-mail because of liability

CHAPTER 5: Government Regulation of Competition and Prices 77 .- I'd E-COMMERCE & CYBERLAW Apple taced its third antitrust trial related to the internet in 2.014. and the most damaging testimony against Apple came from the late Steve Jobsthrough his e-mails. This third antitrust suit had been hanging around for 10 years and dealt with the issue of the Workaround aenrices that had developed to nd a way to get music for the iPods loaded drrough sources other than Apple's Runes. For example. in one e-mail, Mr. Jobs wrote. 'We need to make sure that when Music Match launches their download music store they cannot use iPod. is this going to be an issue?\" That would be the kind of language someone detending Apple against the antitrust allegations in this iPod case would not Steve Jobs's E-Mails in Apple's Antitrust Litigation During the antitrust litigation over the e-hook prising wars, one of Mr. Jolie's e-mails read, \"Throw in with Apple and see it we can all make a go of this to create a real main- stream e-hoolrs market at $12.99 and $14.99.\" The goal was to drive out Amazon from the market because Amazon e-book prices were cheaper. E-rnai'l is discoverable, admissible as evidence, and defr- nite'ly not private. Employees should follow the admonition of one executive whose e-mail was used to fuel a millionsdollar settlement by his company with a lormer employee: 'Il you wouldn't want anyone to read it, don't send it in email." 'arian X. Chen. \"Star \"times: In Apple Suit is Still Jobs.\" New York went to exist. Clayton Act-e federal law that prohibits price discrimination. Robinson-Pawn Act-e federal statute designed to eliminate price discrimination in Interstate commerce. price discriminationmg charging practice by a sell at or different prices to different buyers for commodities oi similar grade and quality, resulting in reduced competition or a tendency to create a monopoly. Times. December I, 2114. p. lit. would result in their domination of the distribution chain and would result in price increases. At the time of the proposed merger, AB lnBcv NV hold 39 percent of the beer market, Millcri'Coors held 26 percent, Modelo held 7 percent. and Heineken, the last of the big four held IS percent. Other beer makers combined hold the remaining 22 percent of the U.S. beer market. If Bud and Corona had merged as proposed, they would have held 46 percent of rho country's bear market. The case was settled after Bud agreed to divestiture of certain brands that it sold that reduced its port-merger percentage of market share. When large-size enterprises plan to merge, they must give writccn notice to the FTC and to the head of the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice. This advance notice gives the department the opportunity to block the merger and thus avoid the loss that would occur if the enterprises merged and were then required to separate.\" For Example, ATELT was required to notir the Justice Department when it proposed acquisition of TMobile because ATBCT's market share was 37 percent and TMobile's was 16 percent. A merger (which was not approved) would have resulted in a company with a 51 percent slur: of the marker.\" 53 Regulation of the Supply Chain and Vertical Trade Restraints 5-3a Price Discrimination The Clayton Act and Robinson-Pawn Act prohibit price discrimination.u Price discrimination accrue when a seller charges diEcrcnr prices to different buyers for "Minus: Willard no or rare, 15 use. start arson. "Thoma Eaton and Spencer A. Ante. 'U.S. Sues to Stop ara'r Deal: Watt Sm Journal, September 9. am. p. A1. "to use. 551, z 3.1. a