discuss why you agree or disagree with their analysis, and explain your position. Does a valid contract exist? If so, explain each element of the contract. If not, explain what elements are missing. This contract is valid. Lucetta offered to buy 20 pounds of flour from Baking World at $5 per pound, and Baking World accepted the offer by shipping the flour. The agreement involved an exchange of $100 for the flour, with both parties mutually agreeing to the termsLucetta to purchase and Baking World to sell and ship the flour. Both parties had the legal capacity to enter into the contract, and the transaction was for something legal. If Baking World ships only 10 pounds of flour, does your analysis change? Is there a valid contract? I think this is still a valid contract. I want to assume that there is a clause in the contract about shipment timeline. The contract would be breached if the remainder of the flour does not get shipped or Lucetta does not receive a refund. If Baking World ships cornmeal, is there a valid contract? Why or why not? Is this a breach of contract? Why or why not? Yes, this is a breach of contract because this is not what Lucetta ordered and paid for. What are the damages for this specific breach of contract? Lucetta could be compensated for the difference between what she agreed to pay for the flour and what she has to pay if she buys it from another source at a higher price. What are the remedies for this specific breach of contract