Discussion Questions 1. In your reasoned opinion, does the information presented in the article (or from any other source you choose to reference) demonstrate negligence on the part of the International Olympic Committee (IOC), the International Luge Federation, and/or the designers of the Whistler luge track? Why or why not? 2. In your reasoned opinion, did Nodar Kumaritashvili "assume the risk" by participating in the luge event? 3. As the article indicates, Olympic authorities made changes to the track after the accident occurred (essentially, they modified the ice track and constructed a wall on the turn where the accident occurred). In the event of litigation, should a court admit into evidence post-accident repairs/modifications? Why or why not