Discussion Topic This week we are learning about, among other things, the unauthorized practice of law. Consider the following: If you have ever hired a lawyer, or know someone who has, you know that they can be very expensive. For certain kinds of cases, like criminal cases or family law, litigants don't have enough money for everything they need. In cases like this, should paralegals be able to do more tasks that traditionally constitute UPL? For poor clients, should paralegals be able to go to court or file documents on their behalf? Why or why not? If you are in favor of expanding the role of the paralegal in certain cases, which cases, which tasks and why? If you are opposed to it, why are you? . Reply to at least two other posts. . In your response to your peers, consider their answers. Do you agree? Why or why not? Be sure to thoroughly discuss the issues, especially if you disagree