Question
DISNEY: DELIVERING MORE CONTENT IN MORE WAYS On July 13, 2017, the Television Academy announced the nominees for the 69th Emmy Awards. Among the contenders
DISNEY: DELIVERING MORE CONTENT IN MORE WAYS
On July 13, 2017, the Television Academy announced the nominees for the 69th Emmy
Awards. Among the contenders for Outstanding Comedy Series were two series by Netflix,
Master of None and Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt. They were competing for the honour
against four series by two long-time Emmy powerhouses: black-ish and Modern Family by
the Walt Disney Company's (Disney) ABC and Silicon Valley and Veep by HBO. The content
battle between technology (tech) giants and the old guard of entertainment had started four
years prior, when Netflix's House of Cards became the first web-only series to receive major
award nominations. A rush of original content by major tech companies ensued, marking a
new chapter in the evolution of pay-TV. Could legacy broadcasters survive as disruption
shifted from the means of distributing content to the content itself? Could a long tradition of
storytelling overcome the deep pockets of Silicon Valley?
Disney had been creating compelling stories since 1928, when Mickey Mouse first debuted
as a trouble-making deck hand in Steamboat Willie. The animated short was heralded for its
technical innovation as the first cartoon with synchronized sound. Disney built on this
pioneering reputation with the first full-length animation feature (Snow white and Seven
Dwarfs), the first film shot with motion-control camera (Star Wars), the first film to use digital
sound (Fantasia), the first feature-length computer-animated film (Toy Story), and the first
network broadcast in high-definition television (the live-action version of 101 Dalmations).
Between 2007 and 2017, new technologies allowed viewers to watch programming
wherever and whenever they were had elevated the importance of accessibility and
convenience to decisions regarding video viewing - and paying. Netflix, Amazon, and
YouTube had moved aggressively into the video entertainment business on the merits of
their innovative delivery and business models. Disney weathered this tumultuous period
through a series of partnerships that tied its success to both the preservation of its legacy
media competitors and the rise of its new technology competitors.
But Netflix, Amazon, and YouTube were now competing against Disney in creation, not just
in distribution. Should Disney continue to partner with these companies as they began to
threaten its core? Should Disney work even closer with other traditional media partners to
fight back? Or should Disney take a stand on its own?
PAY-TV INDUSTRY BACKGROUND
Over most of its history, video content created by studios, sports leagues (professional and
amateur) , and independent agents was aggregated by broadcast and cable networks and
then distributed by TV stations and multi-channel video programming distributors (MVPDs)
to viewers on their television sets. The vertical structure was held together using a
combination of negotiated contracts, partnerships, and vertical integration between content
owners and the aggregators and distributors of that content.
On average, Americans spent nearly four hours each day in front of a television set. To
encourage viewers to watch television, major media companies spent billions of dollars each
year and competed vigorously with each other and with many other parties to acquire the
programming rights of completed works and the intellectual property rights and talent to
produce original content. Although sports programming represented only 1.4 percent of all
television programs, sports dominated what people watched. According to Nielsen,
Americans viewed 134,000 hours of national and regional sports programming on television
in 2017, and 86 sports programs were among the top 100 live-viewed programs for the year.
In 2017, broadcast and cable networks paid US$19.1 billion for media rights in North
America. By 2022, this number was expected to balloon to more than $23.8 billion.
Television programming, aggregated by broadcast and cable networks, was provided via
broadcast or multi-channel subscription services. If a household wanted to watch only
broadcasted network programming, the over-the-air signals could be picked up for free by
using an antenna and a tuner that could transmit the very high frequency (VFH) and ultrahigh
frequency (UHF) signals. According to media, communications, and entertainment
research from SNL Kagan, in 2017, 94 million households paid to receive local broadcast TV
stations and cable channels aggregated by MVPDs.
The purchase and production of programming represented the largest component of
MVPDs' operating expenses, in part due to higher payments for "popular" programming,
digital compression, and technological advances that created more channel capacity. In
2017, the average number of channels in a pay-TV bundle exceeded 200, a jump from 49
and 73 in 1997 and 2007, respectively. Of the various types of video entertainment, sports
programming was the most expensive, accounting for nearly 40 percent of the average
MVPD bill.
Mergers and acquisitions activity, including AT&T's merger with DirecTV in 2015 and
Charter Communications' acquisition of Time Warner Cable and Bright House Networks a
year later, contributed to a higher level of MVPD concentration at the national level in the
United States. More subscribers should have strengthened an MVPDs bargaining position in
carriage negotiations with content owners. However, the horizontal mergers among content
owners and vertical tie-ups, such as the acquisition of NBC Universal by Comcast in 2011,
made the media landscape more complicated and more contentious than ever. On several
occasions, channel access was "blacked out" to viewers because programmers and
distributors could not agree on the terms. The risk-reward trade-off to both parties was
significant, as it put into question whether the value of the programming (customer retention)
justified the transmission and carriage fees.
DISNEY
In 2017, Media Networks was the largest of the four Disney business segments and
accounted for approximately 43 percent of the firm's revenue and nearly half of its operating
income. In this segment, the firm owned and operated television production and distribution
operations (ABC Studios), a broadcast television network (ABC), cable networks (ESPN,
Disney Channel, and Freedom), and eight television stations, six of which were among the
top 10 markets in the United States. Its Studio Entertainment segment, consisting of Walt
Disney Pictures, Pixar, Marvel Studios, LucasFilm Ltd, and Touchstone Pictures, contributed
16 percent to operating income and locked up the largest share of 2017 box office receipts,
at nearly 22 percent. Between 2013 and 2017, Disney's share of box office receipts
averaged 19.5 percent.
The two largest sources of revenue in the Media Networks segment were affiliate fees and
advertising (ad) sales. Affiliate fees, which accounted for more than half of Media Networks
revenues, was per subscriber rates contractually set in multi-year agreements for
programming distribution rights. Disney collected its largest affiliate fees for ESPN, its allsports
cable network that was distributed to approximately 88 million households (down from
its peak of 100 million in 2010). Carriage fees for ESPN's main network alone cost MVPD
providers $7.21 per subscriber, up from $4.69 in 2011. A major reason for the high affiliate
fees was to enable the firm to cover its program creation and acquisition costs. For example,
ESPN owned the programming rights for various collegiate and professional sports,
including Major League Baseball (MLB), the National Basketball Association (NBA), and the
National Football League (NFL). In 2017, Disney spent more than $7 billion for sports
programming rights, approximately half of which went to the three professional sports
leagues.
WHAT CHANGED
In 1996, Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft Corporation penned the phrase "content is king". At
the time, he was referring to the availability of information (data) over the internet, but his
proclamation applied equally well to video programming delivered to television sets by cable
and satellite providers. Households valued and were willing to pay to watch their favorite
shows at the scheduled times; coverage of live events, particularly sports; and TV reruns
and movies found by flipping the channels. But times changed. According to research firm
MoffettNathanson, in 2010, for the first time in history, pay-TV growth dropped below new
household formation. A digital media market research firm, eMarketer, predicted that, by
2019, nearly one in four households would not subscribe to a pay-TV service: they would
have either cancelled their monthly subscription (i.e., were cord-cutters) or had never
subscribed in the first place (i.e., cord-nevers).
For years, digital versatile discs (DVDs) and videocassettes purchased from video chains,
mass merchandisers, or online companies indirectly competed with pay-per-view and videoon-
demand services. Advancements in compression technology during the early 2000s
enabled consumers to skip the physical intermediaries, as large video files could then be
easily streamed over the internet. By 2016-17, more than 100 million US households had
access to high speed internet, and 39 percent of households had some type of over the top
streaming device that enabled internet-based video to be watched on television sets. These
media devices by Roku, Amazon Fire, Apple TV, and Google Chromecast, which ranged in
price from $30 to $100, replicated the experience of watching a broadcast or cable program.
As a result, an increasing number of households cut the pay-TV cord. The number one
reason for doing so, cited by 61 percent of those who quit, was cost (i.e., the could not afford
it or decided the service was not worth the money). A shift was also evolving in how
consumers watched video. Ericsson estimated that by 2020, 50 percent of video would be
viewed on mobile devices (i.e., tablets, smartphones, and laptops), and 70 percent of
consumers would prefer on-demand and catch-up services over scheduled linear TV
viewing.
Broader access to high-speed internet service allowed for the entrance of subscription
video-on-demand (SVOD) services that offered the ability to download television shows and
movies over the internet on request (i.e., non linear). To compete for consumer's
discretionary spending, SVODs needed to offer a robust catalogue and have the financial
capital to underwrite the cost. While most of their content was still acquired from the major
studios under licensing agreements, in 2017, the top three SVOD service providers - Netflix,
Amazon, and Hulu - which, among them had nearly 100 million US-based subscribers,
spent $13 billion on original content for which they earned a combined 125 Emmy
nominations.
NETFLIX
According to the Leichtman Research Group, in 2017, 64 percent of US households had
SVOD services. Of those with SVOD service, 83 percent had Netflix.
Netflix initially arrived on the scene in 1998, as a distributor of DVDs by mail and as a
disruptor to the brick-and-mortar video retail store Blockbuster, and, to a lesser extent,
MVPDs. Ten years later, it was being disrupted by Amazon and Apple. Instead of closing its
doors, it pivoted to distributing video on demand over the internet. Initially, Netflix offered a
library of approximately 1000 titles for $5.99 per month for six hours of streaming. A 2012
deal to become the exclusive streaming provider of movies from Disney's live-action and
animation studios beginning in 2016 was considered a game-changer for the company. It
was also the first time a major Hollywood studio had bypassed the premium channels to
deliver movies direct to consumers.
Recognizing that consumers were drawn to content, in 2013, Netflix began creating its own
programming starting with the adaption of England's House of Cards. By 2016, Netflix had
more than 7000 titles available on an unlimited basis, a price points that varied based on the
number of screens that could be streamed to at the same time. In 10 years, revenues
jumped from $1.2 billion to $8.8 billion, domestic subscribers climbed from 7.5 million to
more than 50 million, and global subscribers across more than 190 countries scaled to 118
million.
In 2017, Netflix spent $6.3 billion on original non-sports content, placing it in fifth place in
spending, behind NBC (at $10.2 billion), FOX (at $8 billion), Time Warner (at $8 billion), and
Disney (at $7.8 billion), and ahead of Viacom (at $5.4 billion) and CBS (at $4.2 billion). Of
the 487 original scripted programs aired on television in 2017, 117 were from Netflix. In
2017, its programs earned 91 Emmy nominations, putting it slightly behind HBO (at 111) and
way ahead of Disney (at 52). In its Third Quarter 2017 Letter to Shareholders, Netflix said
that the "future largely lies in exclusive content," and less on licensing programs from other
content suppliers. The long-term goal was for approximately 50 percent of the content
streamed on its platform to be original.
AMAZON
Amazon, the largest internet-based retailer, was founded in 1994 by Jeff Bezos as an online
bookstore and later a seller of DVDs, Blu-ray discs, and CDs. Amazon launched its SVOD
service in 2011 as an add-on to its $99 per year prime membership service. Prime
membership included free shipping on millions of products sold on amozon.com, and Prime
Video provided access to an extensive library of TV shows and movies, both licensed and
original content. In 2016, Amazon launched its Prime Video service on a stand-alone basis
for $8.99 per month. A year later at a cost of $50 million paid to the NFL, Amazon began
live-streaming professional football games on Thursday nights. The deal involved the "tricast"
of the game on broadcast TV (NBC or CBS), cable (the NFL Network), and the internet
(via Amazon). For non-sports programming in 2017, Amazon spent $4.5 billion. Amazon had
an estimated 26 million US video prime subscribers in 2017.
THE PAY-TV INDUSTRY RESPONDS
Initially in response to the mounting pressure by regulators and consumer advocacy groups
for lower pricing options, MVPDs added "themed tiers", such as a "family tier" and a "sports
tier", which were lower priced and had fewer channels. MVPDs also experimented with how
television shows were consumed by launching "TV Everywhere" options that allowed MVPD
viewers to watch television shows (eg., ESPN) on mobile devices as long as they first
"authenticated" themselves as MVPD subscribers. More recently, in response to increased
competition from alternative video delivery options and cord-cutting, MVPDs began offering
skinny bundles, some of which did not require an MVPD subscription (but did require
broadband access, either fixed or mobile).
New to the pay-TV industry were so-called over-the-top (OTT) services, which distributed
streaming media over the internet, directly to viewers, by going around (or "over the top" of)
traditional content distributors. The most popular OTT services offered by traditional MVPDs
were Dish's Sling and AT&T's DirecTV Now.
In their own response to cord-cutting and the shift of advertising from television to digital,
NBC Universal (which was acquired by Comcast in 2009) and 21st Century Fox (the legal
successor to the original News Corporation) launched their own OTT service, Hulu. Content
from the owners was available exclusively on Hulu and the respective owners' sites.
Revenue was shared by the partners with ads sold against audience buckets rather than
specific programming. Some cable programming was excluded to dampen objections from
MVPDs. Later, content owners including Comcast, CBS, and Time Warner's HBO began
creating direct-to-consumer (DTC) streaming services as supplements to their traditional
networks distributed by MVPDs.
DISNEY PARTNERS WITH LEGACY BROADCASTERS
In 2009, Disney agreed to join Hulu. The three broadcast networks each owned 30 percent
of the company, while Time Warner controlled the remaining 10 percent. The decision to
cede partial control over ABC and Disney content to direct competitors was made with the
hope of gaining additional viewers. By 2017, Hulu was the second largest SVOD with
approximately 17 million US subscribers. It spent $2.5 billion on original content and earned
$1 billion in advertising revenue.
Hulu began producing original content in 2010 with If I Can Dream, a 25-minute reality show
accompanied by digital features that distinguished the program from those available on
linear TV. Hulu then expanded into scripted series, movies, talk shows, documentaries,
animation, and more with its biggest success coming from the multi-award winning dystopian
series, The Handmaid's Tale.
In 2017, Hulu offered customers access to current and previous episodes of programming
owned by its joint venture partners for a monthly price of $7.99 with ads or $11.99 without
ads. That same year, the company launched Hulu with Live TV. For $39.99 per month,
subscribers could access live TV streaming from more than 50 channels added to the basic
streaming service of its on-demand library. The live channels included major broadcast and
sports networks as well as popular entertainment programming (eg., HGTV, the Travel
Channel, and the Food Network).
DISNEY PARTNERS WITH TEHCNOLOGY DISRUPTORS
In 2009, Disney signed a deal with YouTube to offer clips from ABC and ESPN, while
withholding full-length episodes and sporting events. Disney resisted the broad syndication
strategies of other content owners, keeping popular programming restricted to its own
website and Hulu.
In 2012, Disney signed a multi-year licensing agreement with Netflix giving Netflix access to
legacy Disney movies and exclusive rights to first-run Disney films beginning with 2016
releases. The deal was widely credited as establishing Netflix's legitimacy in the premiumcontent
subscription space.
In August 2016, Disney acquired a 33 percent interest in a streaming video technology
company BAMTech, for $1 billion. As part of the announcement, Robert A. Iger, chairman
and chief executive officer of Disney, remarked, "We look forward to working closely with
BAMTech as we explore new ways to deliver the unmatched content of The Walt Disney
Company across a variety of platforms."
MOVING FORWARD
Facing a shit in preferences, new technology, and disruptive entrants, Disney needed to
weigh a vast array of alternative strategies to sustain long-run profitability. Its content had
been critical to the success of trafitional MVPDs, Hulu, and Netflix. Should it exert its power
as kingmaker to hasten or impede the demise of the traditional pay-TV bundle, where its
content had resided for decades? Should it continue to navigate the relationship between
partner and competitor with legacy media companies and well-financed tech firms? Or,
should Disney push aside all gatekeepers and deliver its stories directly to consumers?
QUESTIONS (100 marks)
1. What factors were contributing to the changing media landscape? (10 marks)
2. Describe Disney's major business segments and its responses to the changing media landscape. How did Netflix's business model differ from Disney's? (20 marks)
3. Using Porter's Five Forces, conduct a competitive analysis of the multi-channel video programming distribution (MVPD) market and the TV content market. Where are the greatest threats to profitability coming from? Why? (30 marks)
4. Should Disney continue to partner with other companies as they begin to threaten its core? Should Disney work even closer with other traditional partners to fight back, or should Disney take a stand on its own? What opportunities and risks are associated with these alternative strategies? (30 marks)
5. How do you expect Disney's rivals will respond to Disney's moves? (10 marks)
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started