Do you agree with this analysis why or why not?

Employment at will means that firms can hire and fire without a specified reason (Byrd, 292). According worldpopulationreview.com, all states are "at will" states however, there are few that exemplify exceptions. The public policy limitation suggests that an employer can not terminate an employee if there is violation of the state's public doctrine, state or federal law. Courts and administrators are currently applying the entirely pure intentions and fair managing idea, by which end should be sensible and not with no obvious end goal in mind or aimlessly applied. Disregarding this idea might prompt reformatory harms, notwithstanding genuine harms that have been supported by one of the safeguarded workers.

Employment at will can be productive for some, yet conflicting for others. Productive benefits to employment at will are that it makes the termination process run more smoothly. Companies who employ under contract have a more difficult time because contracts must be honored in full, by both parties prior to termination. At will employers can hire and fire effectively to meet the demands of the firm. At will firms eliminate contract negotiation and renegotiations as well, making the process run more effectively, and the focus become more on the merit of the employee rather than tenure. Conflicts with at will employment are the fact that employees can quit whenever they choose to, When this happens, firms are forced to fill slots immediately to make up for hours and manpower lost. At will employment isn't necessarily attractive to those seeking employment because job security is an attractive attribute according to businessnewsdaily.com. In fact, it makes it difficult to hire true talent. Lastly, with at will firms, there is a "reluctance to tell all" within a firm by former employees. This means that employees of such firms may hesitate to discuss perks of their employment because there is a fear of being terminated for doing so.