DO You have any answer or report about the follow:?

Choose two countries, one from each of the following sets:

Set One: South Korea, taiwan, China, Malaysia, and Brazil.

Set Two: Any country from Asia, Africa, or Latin America that has lagged behind in its development.

First, briefly compare and contrast between the two countries in terms of income and growth, share of employment and output in the three sectors, HDI indices and ranking, poverty, inequality (including gender), and foreign debt.

Second, explain the different levels of development between the two countries in terms of the role of the state. In what ways did the state promote or hinder development in each country? Are there other historical and/or political factors that explain the two different trajectories of the two countries? What conclusions can you draw from the experience of each country in terms of the policies pursued by each. Can the country from Set Two use the same policies pursued by the country from Set One to achieve development? Explain if you agree or disagree. Can your conclusions or be generalized to other than the Set One country you chose? Explain.