Documents To Use: NYT Article: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/12/us/supreme-court-prince-warhol.html (titled: Prince Photo or Just Formerly Known as One? Supreme Court Weighs Warhol's Art).

Brief of Petitioner: https://www.fordham.edu/download/downloads/id/16515/iplj_2022_symposium_course_materials_part_1.pdf

(titled: THE ANDY WARHOL FOUNDATION FOR THE VISUAL ARTS, INC., Petitioner, V.

LYNN GOLDSMITH AND LYNN GOLDSMITH, LTD., Respondents).

This has the Brief of Petitioner in which you can skip to via the 2nd page. Brief of Respondents: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/21/21-

869/232977/20220808150341382_Goldsmith%20Brief%20for%20Respondents%20-%20Final.pdf (titled: THE ANDY WARHOL FOUNDATION FOR THE VISUAL ARTS, INC., Petitioner, V.

LYNN GOLDSMITH AND LYNN GOLDSMITH, LTD., Respondents). Questions:

What is this case about? In your opinion, what is the primary question the Supreme Court will be attempting to answering in this case? What was the outcome at the lower court levels? What are the best arguments of the respective parties? Which argument do you find most convincing? If you were a justice of the United States Supreme Court, how would you vote (and why) on this case?