Does Attorney Pantzov have any legal grounds to ask the trial

court or an appellate court to increase Rhea's obviously low award (to

follow the clear evidence) or to order a "new" trial of Fee's case?

Or, if not,(1)identifythespecific type of ADR

in which a neutral third party in a less formal, out-of-court proceeding makes a decision

the dispute;(2) specify the advantages of this type of ADR; and(3)

citing specific Narrative Facts,explain whytheneutral's decision in this process is "final '' and why Attorney Pantzov has no legal grounds to ask a court to set aside the neutral decision.