does Devyn's response answer the question Which school or schools of jurisprudence does this decision represent? Explain your reasons for the schools of jurisprudence thought represented in this opinions. The schools of jurisprudence that the decision of Roper v. Simmons represents are the Sociological School, the Historical School, and Durkheim's Consensus Theory, all work in practice. The sociological school argues that laws can help society reach its social goals, and they want to make new laws to encourage people to behave in ways that are good for society. The Supreme Court's ruling in Roper v. Simmons considered society's changing opinion against executing juvenile offenders and people's changing values. People who believe in the Historical School say that laws are made up of a society's social norms and change as society does. The Roper v. Simmons ruling, shows that public opinion on executing minors was changing, reflecting this school of thought. The Consensus Theory by Durkheim says that laws come from people agreeing on what is right and wrong. This idea is shown by the Missouri Supreme Court's decision that there was a national agreement against putting juvenile offenders to death because they are too young and don't have enough responsibility. The U.S. Supreme Court held that putting children to death was against the Constitution. Most people thought this kind of punishment was wrong. In the end, the Roper v. Simmons decision is a mix of these different types