Does the United States Supreme Court embrace an Enlightenment view of tolerance when it comes to ruling on the constitutionality of "assaultive speech" (see Matsuda, Lawrence, Delgado and Crenshaw, 1993:7) as it did inR.A.V. v. City of St. Paul,(1992)?

• If so, why?;
• If not, why not?;and
• Consider how other theories of tolerance, civil and political disobedience relate to your analysis.