Doug and Darla were driving on a two lane road at approximately 10:00 pm having departed their wedding reception twenty minutes earlier. It had been a long day and Doug was tired. The multiple glasses of champagne he had at the reception also made him drowsy. In a hurry to get to their hotel, Doug was driving at least ten miles per hour over the posted speed limit when suddenly he came upon a car stopped in his lane of travel. George, the driver of the disabled car, had been stopped in the road for approximately sixty (60) seconds and had not activated his emergency flashing lights, but he did have on the car's headlights. Doug, unable to react quickly enough to avoid a collision, slammed into the rear of George's car, causing serious injury to George, Darla and himself. Assume the jurisdiction follows contributory negligence as a complete defense. Question 1 (2 points) Saved If George sues Doug based on a claim of negligence, what is the outcome if the jury finds George's conduct was a cause of the collision? Question 1 options: A) George wins if the jury finds that he was less than 50% at fault for the collision. B) George wins if the jury finds that George had the last clear chance to avoid the collision. C) George wins if the jury finds that Doug had the last clear chance to avoid the collision. D) George loses