Dr. Wexford is the principal investigator of a large, epidemiological study on the health of 5,000 agricultural workers. She has an impressive dataset that includes information on demographics, environmental exposures, diet, genetics, and various disease outcomes such as cancer, Parkinson's, and ALS. She has just published a paper on the relationship between pesticide exposure and Parkinson's and is planning to publish other papers from her dataset. She receives a request from another research team that wants access to her dataset. They are interested in examining the relationship between pesticide exposures and skin cancer, but Dr. Wexford was planning to conduct a study on this topic soon. Dr. Wexford faces a difficult choice. On the one hand, the ethical norm of openness obliges her to share data with the other research team. Her funding agency may also have rules that obligate her to share data. On the other hand, if she shares data with the other team, they may publish results that she was planning to publish, thus depriving her (and her team) of recognition and priority. It seems that there are good arguments on both sides of this issue and Dr. Wexford needs to take some time to think about what she should do. What advice would you offer Dr. Wexford concerning sharing her data? Include the URLs for three different websites you found that helped you form your response to this question.