Draft each response according to this response template, which is the outline of a "legal analysis" paragraph:

1. Case law facts {one to two short concise sentences with a properly formatted/embedded pinpoint citation after each one}
2. Case law analysis with a properly formatted/embedded pinpoint citation {one to two short concise sentences with a properly formatted/embedded pinpoint citation after each one}
3. Application of the legally relevant facts to the case law facts and the case law analysis {two to four short concise sentences without full citations}
4. This concluding sentence: Therefore, based on [case], the [evidence] will most likely be [admissible or not admissible]

Assignment Instructions (after the "Facts" have been provided): Draft a legal analysis paragraph for the question/story presented. Focus on finding case law from the appropriate jurisdiction. Do not include the question. Only submit your response.

Question: Berkemer, Sheriff of Franklin County v. McCarty

Dan Slater was pulled over in Miami Dade County for swerving, asked to exit the vehicle, and given a field sobriety test. The officer concluded that Slater was intoxicated, read his Miranda rights, handcuffed him, and transported him to the local jail. Slater claims he was in custody when asked to exit the vehicle, so any evidence obtained prior to having his Miranda rights read to him would be inadmissible. What is the most likely outcome of Slater's motion to have the field sobriety test found inadmissible?