During the Covid 19 pandemic, Paul and Prabjot two students at the Okanagan School of Business developed a website (FreddieFitness.com) for their daily online fitness training program, "Freddie Fitness" which they delivered by Zoom for the purposes of enabling students in isolation to stay in shape. (Zoom allows participants to see each other during workout). They offer this program so long as the Covid 19 isolation laws are in place. They thought they may turn this into a business in the future. Their website information promised that if the students completed their program, they would be a buff and muscular "Freddie." Paul and Prabjot charged only a small fee to enroll in the program to cover their development costs and they did not charge for their time in running their daily exercises through Zoom. Michelin Tire has found out about this program and seeks your advice. 1. Identify two primary legal issues for this case (2 marks) 2. State the Rule of Law/definition for the issue and the defense (2 marks) 3. Please create an argument for Michelin on each issue and a defence for Paul/Prabjot on each issue. Clearly state your arguments and defences. (4 marks) 4. State what you think will be the decision for each (2 marks)