During the early part of winter, one morning, two hunters decided to go quail hunting on a property where the owner had given them permission to hunt.

A nearby forest ranger saw the hunters and decided to follow them. He positioned himself about 50 yards away and crouched down in some brush to avoid being seen. After a few minutes, the ranger observed a quail near the spot where he was hiding start to fly away. One of the hunters then fired a bullet which grazed the ranger on his shoulder.

If the ranger brings an intentional tort action against the hunter who fired the shot, will he prevail?

Question 1 options:

A)	Yes, because the hunter intentionally shot the gun.

B)	Yes, because the hunter intended to hit the quail.

C)	No, because the ranger was not placed in apprehension of being hit by the bullet.

D)	No, because the ranger was hit accidentally.