During times of disaster, it is crucial for presidents and emergency managers to have a clear framework for decision-making. Two major public management models that can be used to examine their actions are the rational-comprehensive model and the incremental model, both based on normative political theories. The rational-comprehensive model emphasizes systematic analysis and evaluation of all possible alternatives before making a decision. This approach is rooted in the belief that decisions should be made based on careful consideration of all available information and options. On the other hand, the incremental model suggests that decisions are made through small, gradual adjustments to existing policies rather than through radical changes. While both models aim to improve decision-making processes during disasters, they differ in their approach. The rational-comprehensive model seeks to find the best possible solution through thorough analysis, while the incremental model focuses on making small adjustments over time. These models can inform policies on emergency management at the federal and state levels by providing a structured framework for decision-making. By understanding the similarities and differences between these models, policymakers can develop more effective strategies for responding to disasters and ensuring public safety. Ultimately, incorporating these models into emergency management policies can