Each post sh$.$ Create a new thread with your name when you start your own posting. Fopy one field at a time instead of copying Each post should be done on different dates. Make sure you follow the discussion bor responses, you can just use the reply button.

Readings:

The Ten Most Important Things to Know about Research Ethics article by Dr$.$ Kenneth Pimple

Whistle Blower Article $-$ Students Report Mentor

Grading: You are required to post your own, original response and critique two other responses. Please make your initial post by Wednesday at $11$:$59$ PM EST, and then your $2$ responses to other people's postings by Saturday at $11$:$59$ PM EST.

Initial post must be made by Wednesday at $11$:$59$ pm and the two $(2)$ required replies must be made by Saturday at $11$:$59$ pm$.$ See rubric for discussion requirements and grading criteria.

Discussion Assignment:

Use the "Ten Most Important Things to know about Research Ethics" to assess the "Whistle Blower" Article

Assess the behavior of the following individuals $($Padilla$,$ Ly$,$ Goodwin$)$ and the institution $($University of Wisconsin at Madison$)$ in the "Whistle Blower" article based on the guide on Research Ethics. Consider all $10$ elements for each. Integrate what you know about misconduct and its impacts positive or negative, on either the institution, scientists $($mentor or mentee$),$ science, or society.

Complete the table for Dr$.$ Elizabeth Goodwin $($Mentor$),$ Chantal Ly$,$ Garrett Padilla, and$/$or Dr$.$ Michael Culbertson $($Dept$.$ Chair$)$ to show who complied or not with the rules for research ethics. Submit this completed form via the DB$2$ Assignment Link in Learning Unit $3$ Folder by $11$:$59$ pm on Due Date $($See Blackboard$).$

Then post two of your assessments from the table in the Discussion Board $($include the Element of Research Ethics, Name of Individual$)$ as your Initial Post by Wednesday. Then comment on two other posts by Due Date $($See Blackboard$).$

$\backslash$table$[[\backslash$table$[[$Elements of Research$],[$Ethics$]],$Name the individual,$\backslash$table$[[$Describe what the individual did that was consistent or not consistent with the $10],[$elements of research ethics listed in column $1.$ Integrate what you know about$],[$misconduct and its impacts positive or negative, on either the institution,$],[$scientists $($mentor or mentee$),$ science or society.$]]],[$Honesty$,,],[$Fairness$,,],[$Do no harm,,$],[$Do good research,,$],[$Know & follow the rules,,$],[\backslash$table$[[$Bad rules should be$],[$changed$,$ not broken$]],,],[$Be a good citizen,,$],[\backslash$table$[[$When in doubt, ask$],[$questions$]],,],[\backslash$table$[[$Listen to the still, small$],[$voice of your conscience,$],[$especially when it's$],[$being overwhelmed by$],[$the cacophony of stress$]],,],[\backslash$table$[[$If you suspect unethical$],[$behavior$,$ proceed$],[$cautiously$]],,]]$