Edwina went rock climbing, which is a risky activity. Edwina is an experienced rock climber and is aware of the risks. While standing at the base of the rock face assembling her gear, a car veered off the roadway nearby, and hit Edwina. Edwina suffered injuries and sued the driver for negligence. The driver claims because Edwina was partaking in rock climbing, a risky activity, she assumed the risk of harm $-$ and therefore, the driver raised the defense of assumption of the risk. Based on these facts, will this defense work for the driver?

a$.$ yes

b$.$ no