Elements of the critique Summary of the article (Discuss what the article is about) This part SHOULD NOT include any of your personal input but rather just summarize what the author did in his her research Research Topic What question is the researcher trying to answer Research Methodology How did the researcher study the topic Survey Experiment Statistical Analysis Briefly answer who, what, where, and when, and how Major Conclusions What does the author conclude What recommendations does he make This section should be about 1 5 pages in general The next part is the key of the critique This next sections of your paper gives an assessment of how well the research was conducted based on what you learned Remember you can use your own personal experience and outside articles to help you support your point of view in this section of the assignment In depth critique of the article (Discuss how well the research is conducted in your own words) Write a brief paragraph for each of the following listed elements in your own words Purpose Is the research problem clearly stated Is it easy to determine what the researcher intends to research Literature Review Is the review logically organized Does it offer a balanced critical analysis of the literature Is the majority of the literature of recent origin Is it empirical in nature Objectives hypotheses Has a research question or hypothesis been identified Is it clearly stated Is it consistent with discussion in the literature review Ethical Standards Applied Were the participants fully informed about the nature of the research Was confidentiality guaranteed Were participants protected from harm Operational Definitions Are all terms, theories, and concepts used in the study clearly defined Methodology Is the research design clearly identified Has the data gathering instrument been described Is the instrument appropriate How was it developed Were reliability and validity testing undertaken and the results discussed Was a pilot study undertaken Data Analysis Results What type of data and statistical analysis was undertaken Was it appropriate How many of the sample participated Significance of the findings Discussion Are the findings linked back to the literature review If a hypothesis was identified was it supported Were the strengths and limitations of the study including generalizability discussed Was a recommendation for further research made References Were all the books, journals and other media alluded to in the study accurately referenced Conclusion Considering all of the evaluation categories, is the article well or poorly researched Article link Microsoft Word SERJ12(1)Final doc (iase web org)

The Answer is in the image, click to view ...

Answered step by step

Verified Expert Solution

Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Posted on Jul 13, 2024

Elements of the critique Summary of the article (Discuss what the article is about) This part SHOULD NOT include any of your personal input but

Elements of the critique

Summary of the article (Discuss what the article is about) This part SHOULD NOT include any of your personal input but rather just summarize what the author did in his/her research.

Research Topic
- What question is the researcher trying to answer?
Research Methodology
- How did the researcher study the topic? Survey? Experiment? Statistical Analysis?
- Briefly answer who, what, where, and when, and how.
Major Conclusions
- What does the author conclude?
- What recommendations does he make?

This section should be about 1.5 pages in general.

The next part is the key of the critique. This next sections of your paper gives an assessment of how well the research was conducted based on what you learned. Remember you can use your own personal experience and outside articles to help you support your point of view in this section of the assignment.

In-depth critique of the article (Discuss how well the research is conducted in your own words)

Write a brief paragraph for each of the following listed elements in your own words:

Purpose
- Is the research problem clearly stated? Is it easy to determine what the researcher intends to research?
Literature Review
- Is the review logically organized?
- Does it offer a balanced critical analysis of the literature?
- Is the majority of the literature of recent origin?
- Is it empirical in nature?
Objectives/hypotheses
- Has a research question or hypothesis been identified?
- Is it clearly stated?
- Is it consistent with discussion in the literature review?
Ethical Standards Applied
- Were the participants fully informed about the nature of the research?
- Was confidentiality guaranteed?
- Were participants protected from harm?
Operational Definitions
- Are all terms, theories, and concepts used in the study clearly defined?
Methodology
- Is the research design clearly identified?
- Has the data gathering instrument been described?
- Is the instrument appropriate? How was it developed?
- Were reliability and validity testing undertaken and the results discussed?
- Was a pilot study undertaken?
Data Analysis/Results
- What type of data and statistical analysis was undertaken? Was it appropriate?
- How many of the sample participated? Significance of the findings?
Discussion
- Are the findings linked back to the literature review?
- If a hypothesis was identified was it supported?
- Were the strengths and limitations of the study including generalizability discussed?
- Was a recommendation for further research made?
References
- Were all the books, journals and other media alluded to in the study accurately referenced?
Conclusion
- Considering all of the evaluation categories, is the article well or poorly researched?