Emily Adessa is an attorney employed by a large law firm at a salary of $85,000 per year. She is considering whether to become a sole practitioner, which would probably generate annually $410,000 in operating revenues and $290,000 in operating expenses. Requirements 1. Present two tabulations of the annual income effects of these alternatives. The second tabulation should include the opportunity cost of Adessa's compensation as an employee. 2. Suppose Adessa prefers less risk and chooses to stay an employee. Show a tabulation of the income effects of rejecting the opportunity of independent practice. Begin by performing an incremental analysis assuming that Adessa becomes a sole practitioner. (Use a minus sign or parentheses to show a decrease in incremental income.) Assume Adessa becomes a sole practitioner Less: Incremental income effects per year Now perform the income effect analysis taking an opportunity-cost approach. (Use a minus sign or parentheses to show a decrease in income.) Alternative Chosen: Sole Practitioner Income effects per year Requirement 2. Suppose Adessa prefers less risk and chooses to stay an employee. Show a tabulation of the income effects of rejecting the opportunity of independent practice. Use the opportunity-cost approach. (Use a minus sign or parentheses to show a decrease in income.) Alternative Chosen: Stay as an employee Income effects per year