Explain how the articles relate to one another as well as the importance of this interconnectedness.

I have attached the articles that I will be using:

1. Tzelepis, F., Sanson-Fisher, R. W., Zucca, A. C., & Fradgley, E. A. (2015). Measuring the quality of patient-centered care: why patient-reported measures are critical to reliable assessment.Patient preference and adherence,9, 831-835. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S81975

The purpose of this article focuses on the necessity of patient reported measures to measure IOM patient centeredness. According to Tzelepis et a. (2015), "this article's objectives are to:1) use the six IOM-endorsed patient-centeredness dimensions as a framework to outline why patient-reported measures are crucial to the reliable measurement of patient-centered care; and 2) to identify existing patient-reported measures that assess each patient-centered care dimension.

1. Lachman, P., Batalden, P., & Vanhaecht, K. (2020). A multidimensional quality model: an opportunity for patients, their kin, healthcare providers and professionals to coproduce health.F1000Research,9, 1140. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.26368.3

In this article, a new construct is proposed for defining quality in healthcare and focusing on kindness for all. According to Lachman et al. (2020), "this paper proposes a revised model of quality that is built on never-ending learning and includes new domains, such as Ecology and Transparency, which reflect the changing worldview of healthcare." The authors changed from Person Centred Care to Kin Centred Care. This concept is a broader take on the person and is included in every domain of quality instead of being a separate domain.

1. Hanefeld, J., Powell-Jackson, T., & Balabanova, D. (2017). Understanding and measuring quality of care: dealing with complexity.Bulletin of the World Health Organization,95(5), 368-374. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.16.179309

According to Hanefeld et al. (2017), there aresix specific challenges related to the conceptualization and measurement of the quality of care: perceived quality as a driver of service utilization; quality as a concept shaped over time through experience; responsiveness as a key attribute of quality; the role of management and other so-called upstream factors; quality as a social construct co-produced by families, individuals, networks and providers; and the implications of our observations for measurement." This article discussed the need to improve acceptability, responsiveness and patient-provider trust.

Locate at least three scholarly sources that discuss current publications, work, or applications of ERM framework. For each of these sources, provide the reference and briefly summarize the articles.

1. Tuten, P. (2018). Building an ERM framework for value-focused health care: Appropriately identifying and reconciling risks and opportunities tied to performance-based payment is essential for success and survival under value-based care models.Healthcare Financial Management,72(4), 35.

This article shows how the importance of understanding the relationship between clinical and financial performance in order to prevent and manage risk. There is no one size fits all approach to value-based payment. However, according to Tuten (2018),"value-based ERM frameworks can be adjusted to account for a provider's organizational classification, such as hospital or health system, including risks and incentives associated with its participation in specific value-based arrangements, risk appetite, organizational capabilities and culture, and market and policy forces."

1. Taeho Park, Beom-Cheol Park, Dhong Ha Lee, & Jae-Bong Kim. (2011). Application of an ERM Framework and Its Real-Time System to Disaster Risk Management.2011 IEEE Ninth International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing with Applications Workshops, Parallel and Distributed Processing with Applications Workshops (ISPAW), 2011 Ninth IEEE International Symposium On, 289-292. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPAW.2011.28

According to Taeho Park et al. (2011), this article addresses "the growing risks of economic, societal, and environmental losses from disasters increase a need for a system to prevent, mitigate, or deal with disasters." It also addressed how an ERM framework can assist in preventing, assessing, mitigating, preparing, controlling, and monitor and manage disaster risks.

1. Etges, A.P.B., Grenon, V., Lu, M.et al.Development of an enterprise risk inventory for healthcare.BMC Health Serv Res18, 578 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3400-7

This article addresses the importance for ERM programs and strategic healthcare management processes. The results from the research in this article can be used in several ways: educate professionals, guide identification phase in future ERM programs, and contributing to a risk culture development (Etges et al. (2018). It addressed how cybersecurity is at the top for risk in most industries, including HSOs. According to Etges et al (2018), "Establishing cyberattacks and the risks associated with human capital management (organizational culture, use of electronic medical records and physician wellness) at the top of the risk ranking is an important contribution of this research".