Explain why you agree or disagree with their legal analysis of the case study. If your analysis of the facts is different, list the facts that led you to your conclusion. Discuss whether your peer gave more weight to facts that you found unimportant. What were the terms of the contract between Johansson and Disney? The terms between ScarJo and Disney is that she agreed to continue playing the Black Widow as she has been doing for Marvel. Her compensation would also include additional payouts when and if ticket sales hit a certain benchmark. She was promised a theatrical exclusive. Did Disney perform under the contract? Since Marvel is a subsidiary of Disney, when Disney released the movie on their streaming platform, it violated the contract agreement that stipulated an exclusive theatrical release. The agreement stated it should be released in theater only. What, if any, are the potential defenses to fulfilling the specific terms of the contract? Covid lead theaters to shut down and not allowed public viewing, this defense did not give accurate or normal ticket sales. Disney and Marvel technically are two different entity, ScarJo was under Marvel's contract and not Disney. Was there a breach of the contract and by whom? Yes the breach happened with Disney violating the exclusive theatrical release clause. Did the breach affect the fulfilment of the contract? The simultaneous release likely reduced box office earnings, directly affecting compensation, which was tied to the f