Express the following argument in symbolic form and test its logical validity by hand. If the argument is invalid, give a counterexample; otherwise, prove its validity using the rules of inference.

If Australia is to remain economically competitive we need more STEM graduates. If we want more STEM graduates then we must increase enrol- ments in STEM degrees. If we make STEM degrees cheaper for students or relax entry requirements, then enrolments will increase. We have not relaxed entry requirements but the government has made STEM degrees cheaper. Therefore we will get more STEM graduates.

A request (Can you please explain and give me the answer for this question).