I . EvaluatedeslgmfDiagnostieroductCorporationRerforman80nuQrogram forLL S. basefflelckerviccngmeeras it currentbx w ayin whi elthe progranis b einpmpl em ente What hangewoul ousuggestif any ?ExpIam. 2. Instead)fusinyl DiagnostiProduetCorporatiomntroits U _ S. basedfi eldservic ineerffectively usinpnlyactiomndbr person nlturaeontrolslf so, whanvol%uclu system lookhke 21 f no t ain W eew Case ToyotMot0'SaIesa_I SAJnc. performancasftheregi on agene rahlanagers the leadin bringinpbouthechangeandwhab,vouldye theprocesundtimin$or change Ifnot, whynot? W eeW CaseI FitFoodInc. I . Whatwenb,vrong? 2. WhatshouIdIoeJeIIisonFitFood'CFOdonowthatheknowoftheprobIems? 3. Weew Case2 AtlantiChemicaIndustries I . EvaluatAItant1s 'm nagemem-,ntrokystemsWhaehangesifanydoyou recomm end? W eekl OCaseI ArroeMotorcaorporation 2. 4. Whydid ArrovMotorcaeorporatl Oha vea w entpublic? How(ifatal I) do th e I egalan dmorahb ligatio rdiffer fromthosmfdlreetorofpubh eldcompam es ? Eval uatth eboar)fdirectors ompositi omda etion sAIIthingconsidereuidthe boar&etproperIyDidtheboarnemberEho osdhe op timalimeto terminatBlIIy Ray Repko? Wh emb erdo now(22MareIOO 16)? ul qyrev entedr min imiseeprobl em HlatArrovandits b oar&aced ?