Facts: This case was brought by the plaintiff to compel the defendants to return the two parcels of land described in the complaint which he claimed were sold to the defendants under the right of repurchase for seven years and for the sum of 75Php. Further, the plaintiff alleged that the defendant refused to deliver the same when, upon the expiration of the period, mentioned, he is entitled to redeem the subject parcels of land upon the payment of the amount agreed upon. However, the plaintiff stated that the agreement for the sale with right of repurchase was done verbally between him and Gonda (one of the defendants). When he was placed on the stand as a witness, he testified at length and answered all the questions asked by his lawyer regarding the said agreement/contract, including its details, the persons who witnessed it, the place it was made, and the various other circumstances connected with its execution. The defendant's counsel failed to raise an objection to the examination. The defendant's lawyer also challenged one of the questions as leading and claimed another question was irrelevant. Moreover, he only moved to strike out all of the testimony and statements given by the plaintiff when the examination was already terminated on the ground that the period for the fulfillment of the contract exceeded one year and that it could not be proven except by means of a written instrument. The lawyer also did a cross examination and asked several questions relative to the plaintiff's ownership of the parcels of land. Issue: Whether the two parcels of land were sold under the right of repurchase by the plaintiff to the defendant