Famed spy Boris Badenov was convicted of charges of espionage. When he was arrested, he powered off his Windows 7 computer, so everything in memory would be lost. Yet, at trial, much of what he had been working on just prior to his arrest, was presented as evidence. That is, much of what would have been in memory and was believed to have been lost when he powered off his computer, was presented as evidence. Boris accused the prosecution of fabricating evidence, knowing this data had to have been lost. Yet the prosecution is correct in its assertion that the evidence is genuine; how is this possible?