Farmer Dell has a contract with Beekeeper Bob that allows Beekeeper Bob to keep his bees on Dell's farm in exchange for a large bucket of honey every season. Old MacDonald's farm is next door and benefits from the pollination the bees provide to his crop. Dell and Bob have a fallout over the relationship between Dell's son and Bob's daughter. Dell breaches his agreement with Bob by removing the bees from his property. Does MacDonald have any cause of action against Dell now that the bees are not pollinating his crop?

Yes, because MacDonald was a third party beneficiary.

Yes, he should sue for intentional tort.

No, because he was an incidental beneficiary of the contract.

No, because he was an intended beneficiary of the contract.