Q2.

What is the best explanation for this question?

2:16 PM Wed 10 Feb Question 2 Chew was employed by Pestbusters Ltd as a fumigator in January 2004. Pestbusters Ltd carried on business as white ant and general pest exterminators and fumigators in Singapore and Malaysia. As a new employee, Chew did not know anything about fumigation, but he was a fast learner and in June 2005, he was appointed acting manager of Pestbusters when the manager went on leave. In his capacity as acting manager, Chew had access to Pestbusters' customer database including the rates charged. He was also involved in marketing Pestbusters' services to potential clients. Chew left Pestbusters with effect from 31 December 2005. In January 2006, Chew set up Fumigation & Pest Control Ltd, a company incorporated in Singapore and carrying on the business as white ant and general pest exterminators and fumigators and became its director. Pestbusters complained that Chew was in breach of his employment agreement which contained the following clause: \"On leaving the services of the employer for any reason whatsoever the employee shall not carry on the business of white ant exterminator or fumigator anywhere on the Island of Singapore either by himelf or in partnership with others nor shall he take any employment with any person, firm or corporation carrying on the business of white ant exterminators or fumigators or any such similar business until the period of 3 years has expired from the date of the employee leaving the services of the employer.\" Advise all the parties. ca) 0. 87%