Farmer John grows corn on 25 acres on his farm in lowa. He uses the corn to feed his family and his prize winning pig, Babe. He has a very hungry family and pig and does not have extra to sell on the open market. The Federal government (Congress) has enacted a law that states that any farmer in the U.S. can only grow corn on a maximum of 12.5 acres. The intent of the law is that there is a surplus of corn in the U.S. and that this will help keep corn prices higher so farmers can stay in business. A substantial fine was assessed to Farmer John because he violated this law. Farmer John sues the United States in U.S. District Court. What legal theory will the United States make to the court? O Based upon the Privacy doctrine, Farmer John's activity is not protected under this doctrine and violates federal law. O Based upon the Aggregation doctrine, the effect of Farmer John's activity would impose a substantial effect on interstate commerce. O Based upon the Privileges and Immunities clause of the U.S. Constitution, Farmer John's activities are not protected