Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Fidela Legaspi v. Court of Appeals, et al. L-39877, Feb. 20, 1976 FACTS: An urban lot, owned by a certain Pestejos, was sold to a

Fidela Legaspi v. Court of Appeals, et al.
L-39877, Feb. 20, 1976
FACTS: An urban lot, owned by a certain Pestejos, was sold to a certain Aguilar, an adjacent lot owner, although another adjoining lot owner, Legaspi, had offered to buy the same lot. Legaspi was interested in the purchase of Pestejos lot, because a portion of her (Legaspis) house was standing on a part of Pestejos lot. After the sale to Aguilar, Legaspi tried to redeem the lot by offering a reimbursement of the purchase price. The offer was refused.
Issue: Should redemption by Legaspi be allowed?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Guide To Audit Data Analytics

Authors: AICPA

1st Edition

1945498641, 978-1945498640

More Books

Students also viewed these Accounting questions

Question

Describe the steps in creating a decision table.

Answered: 1 week ago