Filmmaker, a retailer of video equipment, telephoned Bootlegger and ordered a $1,500 videotape recorder for his business. Bootlegger accepted Filmmaker's order and sent him a copy of the purchase memorandum that stated the price, quantity, and model ordered and that was stamped "order accepted by Bootlegger." Filmmaker, however, did not sign or return the purchase memorandum and refused to accept delivery of the recorder when Bootlegger delivered it to him four weeks later. Bootlegger sued Filmmaker. Filmmaker raised the statute of frauds as a defense. Decide.