Find the case Trew V 313124 Saskatchewan ltd.,2005 SKQB 79 (CanLII) and very importantly from the case and text book answer the following questions using your own words. a. What was the tort discussed in this case? (1 mark) b. Describe 1 reason why Mr. McDonald became suspicious of the plaintiff.( 1 mark) c. It was stated that the plaintiff had had extensive previous exposure to the judicial process, explain this. (1 mark) d. Name 1 argument that the plaintiff asserted in his affidavit and explain how he said this had affected him. (2 marks) e. In general when opposing parties present evidence in court, what have you learnt from this case as to what positive attributes the judge looked for in a parties' testimony? (1 mark) f. Explain if it is necessary in this tort for the plaintiff to be successful, that actual loss had occurred? ( 1 mark) g. If you were the manager of a store where there could be potential shoplifting, what 2 things would you implement to try to avoid being sued for the tort referred to in this case? (2 marks) h. It was said that the defendant must bear some responsibility for the actions of its employees, explain why? ( 2 marks) i. Name 2 reasons why the judge only awarded nominal damages. (2 marks).