1. Finding the correct legalissue
2. Finding the correctrule
3. Analyzingthe issue byapplyingthe rule to the facts
4. Stating aconclusion

Federal Jurisdiction. BuilderCart from Oregon orders three S-series fabrication machines from Maky & Bros, a manufacturer company from Idaho, to make custom parts for its food carts. They sign an agreement in which Maky & Bros would deliver three S- series machines to BuilderCart for the total price of $65,000. All machines are pre-installed and ready to go upon delivery. When the shipment arrives, BuilderCart has its technician test one machine. The machine seems to be running smoothly for about 5 minutes when it suddenly jams and explodes. The explosion also causes a small fire that destroys some other equipment in the room. The two other machines have no problem. BuilderCart sues Maky & Bros. for the cost of replacing the machine ($21,000) and damages to the facility ($15,000) in U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon (federal court). Maky & Bros. moves to dismiss the claims because it argued the federal court does not have jurisdiction to over these claims. Does the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon have federal jurisdiction over this case? Discuss.