First Case for Week 3 Class, For our discussion, use our textbook as your main resource to answer the questions posed. Do NOT look up the cases and do not post the court's decision for the case. Let's explore the issues of the case ourselves. I will post the court's decision later in the week and we'll see how we did. {Your grade does not depend upon you reaching the same decision the court does.) Please read the case I have included here and answer the questions that follow: Davis Omole had good grades in high school, where he played on the football and chess teams, and went on to college- Twenty-yearold Omole was also one of the chief architects of a scheme through which more than one hundred individuals were defrauded. Omole worked at a cell phone store where he stole customers' personal information. He and others used the stolen identities to create a hundred different accounts on eBay, through which they held more than three hundred auctions listing for sale items {cell phones, plasma televisions. stereos, and more} that they did not own and did not intend to sell. From these auctions. they collected $90,000. To avoid getting caught, they continuously closed and opened eBay accounts, activated and deactivated cell phone and e-mail accounts, and changed mailing addresses and post ofce boxes. Omole, who had a previous conviction for fraud, was convicted in a federal district court of identity theft and wire fraud. Before his trial, he sent e-mail messages to his victims ridiculing them and calling them stupid for having been cheated. During the trial, he displayed contempt for the court. What does this behavior suggest about Omole's ethics? Omole could have been imprisoned for more than eight years, but he received only three years. Was this too lenient? Why or why not? 4!... Dan!\