First, please read the facts carefully and identify all possible legal issues in the case. For example, Party A did XXX which will lead to YYY, thus Party A may lose the case because...// the case have a misrepresentation issue since Party A did Xx that lead Party B think Yy, then it cause B to making decision on Zz.

Secondly, do the identification the legal issues for each of the party involve. (Note: please do focus on issue spotting).

Lastly, argue further and give an example on if a factor change what the result would be for example, "Who would win the lawsuit (and why) if A, instead of acting as she did in the problem, [failed to send the notice] [wrote B urging her to perform] [never responded] [whatever]?" (Note: you may change the factor in any way you want.

Hypo facts are vague which for the purpose for you to change it, for example you may say "if the system instead on date X the warranty still works and Party A have legal stand to ask for remedy - law says party may require remedy"

HYPO 4

S signed a suretyship contract with Bank providing that her deposit accounts with Bank would serve ascollateral for future loans Bank would make to S's brother, B. At the time of signing the suretyship contract, S told Bank's loan officer that she, S, did not want any loans to be made to B unless she, S, approved them in advance. The loan officer replied, "That's right," though the suretyship contract did not require that S preapprove loans to B. Subsequently, Bank made several loans to B -- secured by S's deposit accounts -- without S's prior approval. B did not repay the loans, and Bank debited (took the money out of) S's deposit accounts to satisfy the loans. S sued Bank. S argued that Bank wrongfully debited her accounts because S had not preapproved the loans to B.