Question
Flint Company has recorded bad debt expense in the past at a rate of 1.5% of accounts receivable, based on an aging analysis. In 2017,
Flint Company has recorded bad debt expense in the past at a rate of 1.5% of accounts receivable, based on an aging analysis. In 2017, Flint decides to increase its estimate to 2%. If the new rate had been used in prior years, cumulative bad debt expense would have been $399,500 instead of $291,800. In 2017, bad debt expense will be $136,600 instead of $92,470. If Flints tax rate is 30%, what amount should it report as the cumulative effect of changing the estimated bad debt rate? (Do not leave any answer field blank. Enter 0 for amounts.)
The cumulative effect of changing the estimated bad debt rate $
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started