For each case, the answer must be given in a table that follows the following

format:

$($The details of the violations must be extracted from the descriptions of the cases$)$

Consider the following case study

Fahad received a change request. The request consists of replacing the

application's buttons with arrows and adjust the color palette to one that

mixes red and green text. But when Fahad looked at the prototype, he

found it confusing. The left arrow suggested that the application would

go back to a previous page or cancel some action; instead, this arrow

replaced the button for sending usage information to the company. The

right arrow, on the other hand, upgraded the user license to the more

expensive category; it also silently added an after$-$sale service without

asking for confirmation. Fahad suggested to his manager that this con$-$

fusing design would probably trick users into more expensive options

that they didn't want. The response was that these were the changes

requested by the client and there was no time to verify the software

further.

Shortly after the updates were released into their production system,

Fahad's team was invited to a celebration. As a result of these changes,

revenues at their client had increased significantly over the previous quar$-$

ter. At the celebration, Fahad overheard some of the client's managers

discussing the small increase for refunds by users who claimed that they

didn't want the after$-$sale service, but there weren't many. One manager

noted several complaints from visually impaired users, who noted that

the mixture of red and green text obscured important disclaimers about

the product. $"$So what you're saying, then, is that the changes worked

as planned," said one of the managers.

Identify four ethical principles $($see page after Question $4)$ that were violated in this