For each question should have an introduction statement, followed by a thesis statement outlining what you are going to discuss. A statement or statements of fact (s) that are supported by peer-reviewed citations. A transition that will make an argument or allow you to compare and contrast a topic you are writing on. A conclusion, wrapping up what you have stated, and finishing your argument.

provide peer reviewed research and link for further research.

1. Concerning hot pursuit, has the Supreme Court decided in favor of police or in favor of suspects? Be sure to take a position and defend it in light of several examples of the rationale behind the exception.
2. There is no bright line drawn identifying when a non-stop (voluntary questioning) becomes an investigatory detention. Should the police be required to notifiy persons that they are free to leave (or not) before any questioning?
3. Should the police be allowed to use informants in a school to detect crime? Explain why you feel this way, use case examples where applicable.
4. Should Americans enjoy the right to privacy, even though no such right is listed in the Constitution? Give some current examples of situations in which you believe the right to privacy should be respected by the courts.
5. Using the website http://www.supremecourtsus.gov , find a Supreme Court case and talk about it. Be sure to incorporate at least five key terms learned in lower-level criminal procedure courses that were applied to content learned this week in class.