For each question should have an introduction statement, followed by a thesis statement outlining what you are going to discuss A statement or statements of fact (s) that are supported by peer reviewed citations A transition that will make an argument or allow you to compare and contrast a topic you are writing on A conclusion, wrapping up what you have stated, and finishing your argument provide peer reviewed research and link for further research Explain how the exclusionary rule is applied differently to identifications than other types of evidence and the relevant cases on the issue Should there be a difference Why or why not What is your opinion of the Supreme Court's decision in Miranda DO you believe Miranda is necessary Why do you feel this way Recenlty the Supreme Court revisited Miranda in the Dickerson case Do you agree or disagree with the Dickerson holding Explain your answer What test is used to determine the voluntariness of consent for the police to search an individual or a residence Are all people from diverse backgrounds alike in their ability to understand their options and give true consent Explain why drug courier profiling was developed and sanctioned under certain circumstances by the Court Should race be a factor in drug courier profiling Is it already Why or why not Define and explain the requirements in Terry stops and Terry frisks How do they differ from a search What is your opinion of the Supreme Court's decision in Terry v Ohio Is the decision too restrictive or not restrictive enough

The Answer is in the image, click to view ...

Answered step by step

Verified Expert Solution

Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Posted on Oct 14, 2024

For each question should have an introduction statement, followed by a thesis statement outlining what you are going to discuss. A statement or statements of

For each question should have an introduction statement, followed by a thesis statement outlining what you are going to discuss. A statement or statements of fact (s) that are supported by peer-reviewed citations. A transition that will make an argument or allow you to compare and contrast a topic you are writing on. A conclusion, wrapping up what you have stated, and finishing your argument.

provide peer reviewed research and link for further research.

Explain how the exclusionary rule is applied differently to identifications than other types of evidence and the relevant cases on the issue. Should there be a difference? Why or why not?
What is your opinion of the Supreme Court's decision inMiranda? DO you believe Miranda is necessary? Why do you feel this way? Recenlty the Supreme Court revisitedMiranda in theDickerson case. Do you agree or disagree with theDickersonholding? Explain your answer.
What test is used to determine the voluntariness of consent for the police to search an individual or a residence? Are all people from diverse backgrounds alike in their ability to understand their options and give true consent?
Explain why drug courier profiling was developed and sanctioned under certain circumstances by the Court. Should race be a factor in drug courier profiling? Is it already? Why or why not?
Define and explain the requirements inTerry stops andTerryfrisks. How do they differ from a search? What is your opinion of the Supreme Court's decision inTerry v. Ohio? Is the decision too restrictive or not restrictive enough?