For many years, Charlotte has had to deal with the vandalism and defacement of public property caused by unauthorized graffiti. In an effort to stop the damage, the city banned the sale of aerosol spray$-$paint cans and broad$-$tipped indelible markers. The new rules also prohibited people from possessing these items on property other than their own.Heather Broughton, an artist, wished to create graffiti on legal surfaces, such as canvas, wood, and clothing. Unable to buy supplies in the city or to carry them into the city from elsewhere, Broughton filed a lawsuit against the City of Charlotte, the city council, and Vi Lyles, the citys mayor, claiming that the new rules violated her right to freedom of speech.Do the citys new rules violate the plaintiffs freedom of speech? Provide the reasoning supporting your conclusion.