for Merck and River Blindness case study, Provide a brief description regarding the case.

What are the ethical principles applied in the case?

Based on the new understating of Stakeholders$$ concept, which Stakeholder group $($s$)$ got affected $($from least to most$)$ in the case and how?

What was$/$were the legal obligations, if any, and how it was$/$were differentiated from ethical and moral ones?

While there are four responsibilities in theCarroll's Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility, how does the case prioritized each responsibility?

In your judgment, did the management satisfy the interest of their stockholders? How.

If you were in the decision maker back then, what could you have done to deal with the issue at hand in the case?