For Rafael, he would be permanently jailed without parole, this serves him right for all the people he stole money from. In addition to that he would do community service while jailed without rewards or shortening his sentence. On the other hand, the company technically wont belong to Rafael if hes jailed so it can have a fresh start with a new owner like a big financially known company, an NGO or a trustable shareholder working with the government or like so, basically someone the community can trust. The company will have to guarantee that it will pay all the people back, with an additional compensation, this way people can trust the company's good intentions. Additionally, this company will be under the government's eyes which will encourage people to invest in it after what happened and when they know that the old owner has nothing to do with the new company, this will make the other parties more comfortable and more trusting towards the company. Moreover, they could hold a public conference or an event, that has enough media coverage, to celebrate the company's comeback and

announce their decision. After the company pays all debts, they can start functioning normally and continue providing its services to the community like usual before everything went down.

how is this financially and ethically defensible