For the following question, use the figure and assume that $R$ and

the arules:apriori method was used to generate the output below.

Using the R generated association rule mining output table above,

choose which statement is false $($not likely to be probable given the

rules data above$).$

Question $18$ options:

a$)$ When explaining these results as conclusions to a store owner, it would be fair to say that the owner

can place Coke next to Milk on an aisle because a shopper is likely to by Milk once they buy Coke.

b$)$ When explaining these results as conclusions to a store owner, it would be fair to say that the owner

can place Coke at one end of the store and Milk at the other end of the store because a shopper is

likely to by Milk once they buy Coke and placing items far apart will force the shopper to span the

store $($thereby increasing the purchase of other items$).$

c$)$ When explaining these results as conclusions to a store owner, it would be fair to say that the owner

can place Beer near to Diapers because a person who buys Beer is also likely to buy Diapers.

d$)$ When explaining these results as conclusions to a store owner, it would be fair to say that the owner

can place Coke near to Diapers because a person who buys Coke is also likely to buy Diapers.

e$)$ When explaining these results as conclusions to a store owner, it would be fair to say that Diapers and

Milk are likely $($more than randomly$)$ going to be purchased by the same customer.