Forest Products, Incorporated, manufactures three products (FP-10, FP.20, and FP-40) from a single, joint input. None of the products can be sold without further processing. In November, joint product costs were $240,000. Additional information follows: The sale of FP40 has been banned by a recent law. If FP40 is produced, disposal in an approved manner costs $120,000 for every 55,000 units produced Required: b. Assuming that Forest Products continues to use the physical quantities method of alocation and to manufacture and sell FP-10 and FP-20. What joint costs would be allocated to FP- 10 and FP-20? b. There is a possibutity that a market for FP. 10 and FP. 20 at split-off will develop. In other words, it will be possible to seil the two products rather than process them further At what sales value (at split-otf) would Forest Products be indifferent between selling them at split-off and processing them further? c. At what sales value (at spli-off) would Forest Products be indifferent between seling them at split-off and processing them furthet, in case the disposal cost for FP. 40 increases to $150,000 for every 55,000 units of FP40 produced? Answer is complete but not entirely correct. Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below. Assuming that Forest Products continues to use the physical quantities method of allocation and to manufacture and seli FP. 10 and FF20. What foint costs would be allocated to TP10 and FP20 ? Noto: Do not round intermedate calculations. Forest Products, Incorporated, manufactures three products (FP-10, FP.20, and FP-40) from a single, joint input. None of the products can be sold without further processing. In November, joint product costs were $240,000. Additional information follows: The sale of FP40 has been banned by a recent law. If FP40 is produced, disposal in an approved manner costs $120,000 for every 55,000 units produced Required: b. Assuming that Forest Products continues to use the physical quantities method of alocation and to manufacture and sell FP-10 and FP-20. What joint costs would be allocated to FP- 10 and FP-20? b. There is a possibutity that a market for FP. 10 and FP. 20 at split-off will develop. In other words, it will be possible to seil the two products rather than process them further At what sales value (at split-otf) would Forest Products be indifferent between selling them at split-off and processing them further? c. At what sales value (at spli-off) would Forest Products be indifferent between seling them at split-off and processing them furthet, in case the disposal cost for FP. 40 increases to $150,000 for every 55,000 units of FP40 produced? Answer is complete but not entirely correct. Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below. Assuming that Forest Products continues to use the physical quantities method of allocation and to manufacture and seli FP. 10 and FF20. What foint costs would be allocated to TP10 and FP20 ? Noto: Do not round intermedate calculations