\fPART 1: VELOCITY DETERMINATION FRCJM BALLISTIC PENDULUM Pendulum Mass, M = 243g i o.o5g_ Projectile lil'lassJI m = g i o.o5g_ Pendulum Length, REM = .351n i o.o5 on Trial # Swing Angle Projectile {degrees} Velocity1 v. {nlf s] 2-91 5-?5 5- T5 5.61 5.61 *Assume g: g. T926 mfs Method 1 Mean Projectile Velocity, 51 = 5.31_ i o.o5 1113's *Note the : uncertainty here is your calculated standard deviation: o. A i". Fieyiew your data. Think about hoy.r you performed this method as well as any assumptions used when applying our theoretical physics equations to our setup and equipment. What kinds of uncertainties may haye influenced your result and contributed to the yariation between trials? COMPARISON BETWEEN VELOCITY DETERMINATION METHODS Method 1 {Pendulum} Mean Projectile Velocity, E1 = 5.21_ i o.o5 mfs Method 2 {Range} Mean Projectile 1Ll'elocitffr, ll = 4.81 i o.o5 mils B. What is the Percent Difference between the yelocities of yourtwo methods? %Dff = Ml ac lx \"\"3 (ENE!)