Frank and Allen ran a small software company together, and they developed a scheme to cheat on their taxes. They set up a dummy corporation, Alabaster, Inc., and they then made payments to Alabaster for "consulting" work. They deducted these payments from the reported income of their actual company and then paid taxes on the falsely reported income. They then reported false "losses" for Alabaster so that Alabaster would have no income. Frank and Allen were ultimately arrested and their trial was severed. In Frank's trial, the prosecutor sought to admit an e-mail written by Allen to Frank which said: "I made another $50,000 payment to Alabaster today. That brings the total payments this year to $250,000." Frank objects to the e-mail as hearsay. Is Allen's statement admissible? Group of answer choices Allen's statement is admissible for the truth of the matter asserted as a party-opponent statement. Allen's statement is inadmissible for any purpose. Allen's statement is admissible to prove Frank knew about the payments, but not for the truth of the matter asserted. Allen's statement is admissible only if Frank is unavailable